TEDx Grantham
Blog/

The digital skills gap facing Grantham's adult learners

Over 80% of Lincolnshire's job vacancies require digital skills, yet 80% of employees lack competence with Teams, Slack, and similar tools—a gap that sits not at foundational level but in an intermediate tier that remains unserved.

The digital skills gap facing Grantham's adult learners

What happens when you search for digital courses in Grantham

Picture the scenario: someone in Grantham has just been made redundant, or is returning to work after years of caring for a family member, and they want to do something about their digital skills. They open a browser and type something into Google. The search query almost writes itself — not 'digital courses Grantham' but 'FREE digital skills training Grantham adult learners'. The word free appears before anything else, because cost is the filter that comes first.

What comes back on that first page shapes everything that follows. Google's AI Overview for local digital skills names two providers: Grantham College and 2aspire, the Lincolnshire Adult Skills and Family Learning Service. No library is listed. No community digital hub appears. No drop-in centre is singled out for Grantham specifically. Two options, presented cleanly, and then the rest of the internet.

For most adults, the first page of results is the entire map. Anything that sits beyond it — whether a local initiative, a council service, or a neighbourhood resource — is functionally invisible, regardless of whether it actually exists. The discoverability layer is not a minor administrative detail; it is where decisions about whether to pursue learning at all are quietly made.

The entry-level offer: what free and accessible provision exists

Both providers that surface in that first page of results are real, publicly funded, and reachable. Grantham College runs a Digital Functional Skills course covering using computers and devices, creating documents and spreadsheets, sending emails safely, and protecting personal data. Eligible adults can enrol free of charge; applying is straightforward — by phone, email, or through the college's adult learning page. 'Eligible' is worth stating plainly: entitlement is tied to personal circumstances such as employment status or prior qualifications, so not every adult will qualify for the free route, though many will.

2aspire, the Lincolnshire Adult Skills and Family Learning Service, provides the other strand of this foundational tier. Its digital offer includes a 'Basic Digital Taster' and a 'Digital Employability' course for adults aged 19 and over, delivered in community venues across Lincolnshire. Scheduling is flexible, designed to fit around work or family commitments, and sessions take place in accessible local settings rather than requiring a college campus visit.

Together, these two providers form the accessible, publicly funded baseline. The 'free' that search queries demand does exist — but it sits at foundational level: skills for everyday life and basic workplace readiness, not advanced technical training. That distinction matters more than it might first appear.

The advanced tier: bootcamps, the IoT campus, and the timing problem

Above the foundational tier, the picture changes considerably — both in ambition and in access. Grantham College's Institute of Technology operates from a purpose-built site at the converted grade II-listed Stonebridge House, housing digital technology suites and IT design studios. The college launched Level 3 and Level 4 digital bootcamp courses in October 2021 — Cyber Security, Cloud Computing, Coding and Software Development, IT Networking, and Digital Marketing — designed in collaboration with over 80 regional employers through the Lincolnshire Institute of Technology consortium, with the curriculum shaped to reflect what those firms said they needed to hire for.

The Greater Lincolnshire Skills Bootcamps extend this offer county-wide. Delivered by Lincolnshire County Council in partnership with Tech Educators and 2aspire, and fully funded by the Department for Education, they run for at least 60 hours and cover Cyber Security, Software Development, and AI for Business. Completion comes with a guaranteed employer interview — a meaningful incentive for anyone returning to work or changing career direction.

The problem is timing. As of mid-2026, the 2025/2026 Skills Bootcamp intake had closed and the 2026/2027 programme was still in its setup phase. For someone who discovers these options at the moment of need — a redundancy notice, a job advertisement listing qualifications they do not have — the window may be shut for months. This is not a flaw unique to Grantham; bootcamp-style provision nationally runs in cohorts rather than on a rolling basis. But the practical effect locally is the same: advanced digital training is available in theory with considerably more reliability than it is available in practice.

How large the need actually is — and what's going unmet

Fifty-two per cent of working-age adults in the UK cannot complete all 20 basic digital tasks that industry and government consider essential — a figure from FutureDotNow in May 2025 that translates to a direct economic cost of over £23 billion a year. The House of Commons Library (April 2024) put a sharper workplace frame on the same problem: 7.5 million adults, or roughly 18% of the UK total, fall below the essential digital threshold for employment.

The Lincolnshire picture is, if anything, more striking. Over 80% of advertised local vacancies require some degree of digital proficiency. Yet around 80% of employees in the county struggle to use digital collaboration and project tools — Teams, Slack, Trello — competently. That is not a skills-free population; it is a population with partial skills that fall short of what work actually demands.

This is the 'hidden middle': adults who are not digitally excluded in the basic sense, but whose existing capabilities are not sufficient for the roles available to them. They are employed, or recently were, and are not the primary audience for foundational provision. They are unlikely to qualify for, or feel suited to, an intensive 60-hour bootcamp targeting career changers.

The Greater Lincolnshire LEP's Local Skills Report of January 2022 made this gap explicit, calling for additional support for people further from the labour market to access digital employability routes. Lincolnshire's Public Health Annual Report 2023 went further, naming digital exclusion as a population health risk — not simply a workforce statistic.

What neither report fully resolved is that the current two-tier structure — foundational courses at one end, advanced bootcamps at the other — has no natural landing place for the middle band.

What strategy and governance look like at the local level

Behind Grantham's digital training offer sits a fragmented accountability structure. South Kesteven District Council embeds its approach to digital inclusion within the Customer Experience Strategy (2025–2029), which guarantees offline access for residents who are not online. That is a protective commitment, but it sets no active targets for moving adults further up the skills ladder. The responsibility for that sits elsewhere.

For years, the 'elsewhere' was the Greater Lincolnshire Local Enterprise Partnership, which co-funded a Digital Skills Centre at New College Stamford and published a county digital skills strategy from 2019. The Stamford centre remains the nearest comparable facility to Grantham — 11 miles away, serving a different catchment. The gap was not designed in; it reflects where funding was directed.

In February 2025, the LEP's strategic functions transferred to the new Greater Lincolnshire County Combined Authority. The body now responsible for coordinating digital skills provision at a regional level is still establishing its operating structure, which means the transition period carries a degree of strategic pause.

Employer-led activity fills part of the space. Firms such as Autocraft embed augmented reality and digital twin technologies directly into their manufacturing workflows, upskilling workers on the job. This provision is real — but it operates outside any formal accountability framework, is invisible to enrolment statistics, and is accessible only to people already employed in those sectors. The adults most likely to be searching for a route in are precisely those it cannot reach. What the Combined Authority could clarify, once settled, is which body is ultimately accountable for that gap — and whether the combined picture of provision is sufficient, not just varied.

What adult learners in Grantham can reasonably expect — and what remains unclear

For an adult in Grantham today, the practical picture is more asymmetric than the range of available provision might suggest. The foundational route is accessible — but whether enrolment capacity is meeting local demand in volume, not just in subject range, remains genuinely unknown. No published waiting-list or take-up data exists for either provider serving the Grantham area. A broad course catalogue and a full classroom are different things, and the evidence to distinguish between them simply does not exist yet.

The timing constraint at the advanced end is the sharper day-to-day limitation. Someone whose need is specific and urgent — a job application, a redundancy, a return-to-work moment — cannot assume that the programme they need will be open when they need it. That is a structural feature of how intensive provision is funded at national cohort level, not a local failing; but for the individual learner, the distinction is cold comfort.

What 2aspire's community-based model points toward — local venues, flexible hours, open-entry design — is what a more continuous intermediate offer would need to look like. It is the closest existing infrastructure to that function, even if it is funded and designed for foundational work rather than the step above it. Nothing in Grantham currently occupies the middle band with permanence.

The honest summary is that Grantham's digital skills provision rewards people who know what they are looking for and can be patient about timing. For those who do not yet know where to start, or who need something above the foundational tier at a precise moment, the system depends more heavily on chance of timing than on any designed pathway. That asymmetry is the most useful thing to hold onto — more useful than either reassurance or alarm.